1. What techniques I have learnt?
- The role of each lino carving tool
- V-Gouge (small, triangular tool): Narrow and
sharp lines.
- U-Gouge (small, round tool): Shallow and fluent
lines.
- Large Line
(large, triangular tool): Deep and thick
lines.
- Large
Gouge (large, round tool): Broad and
dark lines.
- The difference between water-based inks and
oil-based inks
- Water-based
inks are more soluble and easier to clean up.
- Water-based
inks have a more ‘powdery’ outcome onto a print.
- Oil-based
inks have a more superior colour and are easier to copy a print onto.
- Oil-based
inks take a longer amount of time to dry.
- The equipment needed for printing
- Lino
rollers (either plastic, metal or wooden)
- A printing
press
- Lino
printing ink.
- A barren (a concave sheath, wrapped in bamboo)
2. Why are my choices reflective of contemporary
influences?
- Skeletons
on the triangular path depict the ‘dead-end’
path of their life, as they have been stolen for the human trafficking trade.
- Chinese
writing is a direct translation to a quote by Sylvia Plath, regarding slavery; ‘I must get my soul back from you; I am
killing my flesh without it,’. This is due to modern-day trafficking being
labelled as ‘slavery of the 21st
century’.
- Limbs that
are amputated and maimed are a direct presentation of various tortures within
this trade.
- Repetition
of skulls represents sufferers of the trade, where specific victims are lost to
the knowledge of society.
3. What worked well?
- The image of the skeletons
- Skeletons
represent excessive punishment endured by trade sufferers. This has caused
emotional and physical deficiency, where a lack of free-
thinking
and low self-worth leave only a ‘frame’ of
a previous character.
- This
confronting image proves its salience to the audience.
- The Chinese writing
- The
foreign translation of this quote proves evidence of the location of these
trafficking events.
- The
delicate carving of the letters were also presented when printing the image,
and enabled an apparent view at the quote’s meaning, to native speakers.
4. What I could have completed differently?
- The repetition of skulls
- The
intended salience of the skeletons became ‘lost’ in the skull repetition. If I were
to complete this differently, I would reduce the amount of skulls within my
work.
- There was
not much variation between each skull, therefore the audience cannot clearly
perceive the specific victims of this trade. I could emphasize the diverse
characters between each skull, by different carving and design.
- It was not
clear that the repetition in the background of my work, was that of skulls. To
complete this work differently, I should view various skull interpretations and
create my own based on a biological perception.
No comments:
Post a Comment